51³Ô¹ÏÍø

Good afternoon, everyone. 
 
I'd like to start by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land we meet on today, the Ngunnawal and Ngambri peoples, and pay my respects to their elders past and present. 
 
I'd also like to thank SIA President, Michael Fitzgerald, and the Executive Committee for allowing me to be part of this excellent conference program. 
 
The announcement of the AUKUS partnership in September last year was dominated by the plan for Australia to acquire a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines. 
 
This was big news for the Institute and its members, but it was also big news for the university sector. 
 
The challenge
 
Nuclear-powered submarines are some of the most complex machines human beings have ever developed.   
 
Bringing a fleet of these into service will be one of the biggest training and workforce development challenges Australia has faced. 
 
As the Defence Minister said here yesterday, AUKUS will demand a transformation in Australia's cultural relationship with science and technology. 
 
Our AUKUS partners expect Australia to pull its own weight and develop sovereign capability to operate and maintain the fleet. This will require the integration of military, industry, government and academia to create an entirely new sector of the economy. 
 
The task goes beyond training the crews of future submarines. We can't just acquire nuclear technology without being able to provide best-practice nuclear stewardship. 
 
The challenge includes building the nuclear knowledge across all elements of the enterprise including corporate, nuclear physics, engineering, legal, policy, security and human resources across government and industry. 
 
Australia has a strong international track record as a contributor to nuclear non-proliferation policy and a reputation as a responsible global citizen. But a fundamental uplift is required to develop the nuclear mindset required to be the custodian of this technology.
 
Australia has the expertise and capability. What we don't have yet is the scale to deliver the graduates and skills in the quantities required.
 
We can do this. But it requires deliberate urgency. 
 
The time from now until the first submarine is ready to enter service gives us a window of opportunity to scale up our capacity.
 
But decisive action needs to be taken now so that we can be where we need to be in a decade's time.  
 
I was heartened by the Minister's comments yesterday acknowledging that even though the entry into service of Australia's first nuclear-powered submarine seems a long way off, he understands there is no time to waste. 
 
This challenge can't be left to Defence alone. It will need a whole-of-government commitment to identify the skills and resources required.  It will need a new approach to partnering with the universities who will deliver the training. 
 
I will come back to this concept of partnership later. 
 
STEM pipelines
 
I know that in Defence circles there is often talk about solving capability gaps in the transition from one system to another. That is obviously a critical issue for Vice Admiral Mead and his team to deal with.
 
But I'm here to tell you today that whatever submarine design ends up being chosen, we won't be able to build and operate it locally unless we address the fundamental issue of Australia's workforce capability gap.
 
We all know how hard it is to recruit and retain skills in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, or STEM. 
 
Only last month, General Campbell and Secretary Moriarty announced a series of expanded employment benefits that are needed for Defence to remain competitive as an employer in an increasingly tight labour market. 
 
This is consistent across all sectors that rely on these skills and Defence is no different. 
 
The outlook is concerning. Only nine per cent of Australian year 12 students are currently taking higher mathematics and only another 17 per cent are taking intermediate mathematics. This is foundational knowledge needed for success in STEM fields. 
 
Compounding this, the Productivity Commission recently found the Job Ready Graduates program - the funding scheme that allocates Commonwealth funding for university degrees - creates flawed incentives and reduces the return to universities for offering STEM places. 
 
The strained labour market conditions we face in 2022 will cripple us in 2032 if we don't take urgent action now to grow our sovereign capability.
 
There are some creative and successful programs that have been developed to meet the skills needs for Defence. An example of this is the ASD-ANU Co-Lab, a 15-year ANU partnership with the Australian Signals Directorate to nurture the next generation of cyber and national security leaders.  
 
Developing the workforce for nuclear-powered submarines will require similar approaches across many fields, done in a coordinated way that builds our critical skills base over time. 
 
This nuclear workforce will need to include not just engineers and physicists, but also lawyers, regulatory experts, specialist medical staff, naval architects and policy advisers to decision-makers. 
 
There is opportunity within the challenge too. The scale of our skills needs means there is no longer any excuse for women remaining such a small minority of the STEM workforce.  According to the Chief Scientist, women still comprise only 29 per cent of university STEM qualifications. 
 
The same can be said with students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
 
While the HELP system provides broad access to university, support for students from disadvantaged backgrounds is so low that most have no choice but to go to the university closest to home, not the one that best caters for their skills and interests.
 
Capable students, whoever they are, need to be identified and incentivised to pursue careers in AUKUS fields.
 
Many of these roles will require years of training and experience.
 
As Vice-Admiral Mead noted recently in The Australian, starting today we need to set a 14-year-old schoolgirl on a path to be captain of Australia's first nuclear-powered submarine. 
 
Let me illustrate how this plays out. To get undergraduates to study nuclear physics, we will typically bring them to campus at the end of year 10 for a summer science program. If we did one (which we are not) tailored for the AUKUS workforce requirements, this would deliver a new set of undergraduates starting their degrees in 2025. These students would finish their undergraduate degrees in 2029, but many would require at least a Master's degree (completed by 2030), or PhD (completed by 2033).
 
That schoolgirl will probably get her nuclear science education right here in Canberra at The Australian National 51³Ô¹ÏÍø. 
 
Why ANU?  To start with, because the only practising experimental nuclear physicists at Australia's universities are across the lake at ANU. And one of them, Dr AJ Mitchell, is here today.
 
But more broadly, because this is what the ANU was established to do. 
 
ANU national mission
 
Our status as the national university is not just a label. It's part of the law of the land. 
 
The Australian National 51³Ô¹ÏÍø Act specifically defines one of the 51³Ô¹ÏÍø's functions as "encouraging, and providing facilities for, research and postgraduate study, both generally and in relation to subjects of national importance to Australia."
 
One of the ways ANU has honoured its mission is in our commitment to science. 
 
Fifty per cent of Australia's PhDs in physics come from ANU. To build on this strength, we have just completed a $200 million capital investment to develop a new, world-class facility for our Research School of Physics.   
 
This is the most complex scientific laboratory building ever constructed in an Australian university and will support teaching and research into quantum physics, precision optics, space applications and novel devices. 
 
ANU has a longstanding and trusted relationship with Defence spanning numerous academic disciplines.  This includes the Co-Lab with ASD, the National Security College, the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre and a range of non-military executive education and training. 
 
For more than 70 years, ANU has been the only university in Australia providing comprehensive training in nuclear physics from undergraduate to postdoctoral level. We maintain one of only three heavy ion accelerators in the world. This enables us to incorporate hands-on experimentation into our teaching and attract international research collaborations, including from the US Department of Defense. 
 
ANU is also uniquely placed to help government manage the complex regulatory obligations associated with nuclear technology.  We are already training Commonwealth officials across several agencies through our Graduate Certificate in Nuclear Technology Regulation and our Masters in Nuclear Physics. 
 
As a result, ANU has existing partnerships with leading universities in nuclear science in AUKUS countries, including those that are part of the US and UK nuclear-powered submarine programs. 
 
Recommendations
 
Circling back to the topic of my speech, how can we build the AUKUS workforce? At ANU we have identified three things government should do now that will enable us to meet this challenge. 
 
First - to build a national nuclear enterprise, government should establish and define nuclear stewardship as a Sovereign Industrial Capability Priority, or SICP, to provide investment certainty. 
 
These priorities are intended to ensure access to essential skills, technology, intellectual property, financial resources and infrastructure in critical areas to the Defence mission.
 
Just like industry, universities require planning certainty to make investments in capability and course offerings.
 
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly eroded the financial position of most universities. 
 
My university runs the only comprehensive nuclear physics program in the country. But scaling up that program will require upfront investments in infrastructure, facilities and academic recruitment that I - and indeed - no one in Australia - can afford right now.  
 
There must be a program of support; the de facto alternative - waiting for international student fees to return to previous levels - is unthinkable.
 
A formalised SICP for nuclear stewardship would signal the priority being placed on developing sovereign capability in nuclear education and research. It would support the universities who will need to play a central role in building the skills and knowledge base to make the investments required to produce the graduates required. 
 
Second - government should consider establishing an AUKUS career pathways program to harness high-achieving school-age students and provide long-term development and career progression in critical skills. 
 
AUKUS will demand a stronger pipeline of students choosing to undertake university study in key fields. 
 
Nuclear science should clearly be the first cab off the rank for this program, but this approach will also be necessary across the broader advanced capabilities of AUKUS including in cyber and computing, engineering, space and quantum physics.
 
An AUKUS pathways program, jointly developed with Defence, could feature a portfolio of tailored degree programs providing a pathway for students to gain qualifications in an AUKUS-related field and then progress to a position in Defence working on AUKUS programs. 
 
Such a program could include:
 

• Courses in strategic defence studies and national security being incorporated into STEM degrees to instil a strong understanding of the strategic drivers and applications of technical skills.

• Assigned mentors from Defence and regular exposure to Defence leadership, to establish a connection to AUKUS programs from an early stage.

• Processing security clearances for students while they are studying to enable real work experience and practical placement opportunities with Defence.

• Guaranteed placement in Defence at the conclusion of the program, bypassing existing Defence graduate programs. 

• Interstate field trips and international exchanges with our US and UK partner universities to reinforce the trilateral partnership.

• Guaranteed accommodation at a university hall of residence to overcome the barriers that exist for students relocating to study. 

 
Degree programs with some of these features, tailored specifically for AUKUS priorities, will also assist the government as it begins the task of rebuilding the technical capability of the public sector. 
 
A pipeline of qualified recruits will support Defence to provide contestable advice to government. The reliance on private contractors will be reduced, delivering greater value for money over the long term.
 
Third - and this goes to the concept of this being a national mission, rather than just a task for Defence - government should remove the barriers it has created through funding rules that prevent universities from being more dynamic in meeting national capability priorities. 
 
The new government's Australian Universities Accord process presents an opportunity to look at how universities and government can work together to tackle the challenges we face as a nation. 
 
Conclusion
 
To conclude, the introduction of nuclear-powered submarines will require substantial development of Australia's scientific and engineering capacity.
 
We cannot afford to drag our feet on this. 
 
Building the sovereign, nuclear-literate workforce we need will require a pipeline of academic staff to deliver education and research at scale, and credible pathways to an AUKUS career that attract the best students from across the country. 
 
This is a huge workforce development challenge. It is one we can meet but it requires government to invest in, and partner with our universities now to build the capacity we need in the future. 
 
Thank you.