51³Ô¹ÏÍø

Under the FOI Act 1982 (Cth), could you please provide me with: 

all 2022, 2023 and 2024 documents and correspondence (internal memos, reports, emails etc.) between the Vice-Chancellor, ANU executives and/or members of the public and/or other universities, related to Professor Saikal's nomination and its implementation (i.e. conferral of title) and among them: 

                - all documents and correspondence from and to the Chancellery, CAIS, RSSS and CASS members of staff, academic and professional;

                - all documents and correspondence between ANU executives and members of the community and/or active and retired staff members of Australian or foreign universities;

                - all documents and correspondance between CAIS Advisory Board members and ANU executives regarding this nomination.

                - all documents and correspondence that mentioned, enclosed and/or constituted the mandatory references for this nomination.

the minutes of the most recent CAIS Internal Review, specifically comments made by invited participants in regard to Prof Saikal's nomination to the status of Emeritus professor.

Detailed minutes for the ANU Council meeting on August 9.

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, I request access to copies of the following documents: 
A full recording of the lecture, "International Women Day Lecture | Palestine is a Feminist Issue" () from the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies, a partial recording of which can be found here: . 

Copies of correspondence between any member of staff at the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies and lecturer Dr Samah Sabawi.

Date range for the documents being requested
7 October 2023 to the present day 27 June 2024

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, I request access to copies of the following documents: 
Documents relating to the decision to now renew the leases of the childcare centres at ANU, announced last week by the ANU.
Specifically, if there are any documents that include an assessment of different options and why a decision was made to proceed with not renewing the leases. 
Alternatively, if there is no document that includes an assessment, then any document that says why an assessment was not necessary.

If neither of those exist, then perhaps meeting minutes of the ANU commercial services team that include any material discussion around the child centre closure.

In a quote to RiotAct yesterday, your spokesperson referred to: external heritage advice on how [ANU] could satisfy obligations under heritage laws while also operating the buildings as childcare centre

(See ). I request access to that advice, any reports prepared for that purpose, and any associated correspondence, emails or messages’